State v. Lakeside’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3481
Relies on Griffin v. California · Malloy v. Hogan · McNabb v. United States · United States v. Hale · Corallo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the better rule is to not give instructions ostensibly designed for defendant's benefit over the knowledgeable objection of competent defense counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under the laws of this State a defendant has the option to take the witness stand to testify in his or her own behalf. If a defendant chooses not to testify, such a circumstance gives rise to no inference or presumption against the defendant, and this must not be considered by you in determining the question of guilt or innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lakeside v. Oregon“THE COURT: The defendant did orally request the Court just prior to instructing that the Court not give the usual instruction to the effect that there are no inferences to be drawn against the defendant for failing to take the stand in his own behalf. 9”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Lakeside v. Oregon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.