State v. Harryman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"However, a trial court does not err in refusing to give a proposed instruction-even if legally correct-if the substance of the requested instruction is covered fully by other jury instructions given by the trial court or if the requested instruction is not necessary to explain the particular issue or point of law to the jury."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 293 Or. App. 340 - State v. Roberts · 297 Or. App. 812 - State v. Haws

2. “"[A] person is justified in using physical force upon another person for self-defense or to defend a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force, and the person may use a degree of force which the person reasonably believes to be necessary for the purpose."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 289 Or. App. 324 - Harryman v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

3. “so-called 'typographical error,' " was not a correct statement of the law); State v. Harryman , 277 Or. App. 346 , 357, 371 P.3d 1213 , rev. den. , 360 Or. 401 , 381 P.3d 843 (2016) (trial court must "refrain from instructing the jury on irrelevant matters, or those that may have the effect of confusing the jury”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 1 - State v. Moles