Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 P2D 690 - Weatherford v. State

Weatherford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
January 1968
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 90 Okla. Crim. 120 - Ward v. State · 75 Okla. Crim. 42 - Bennett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to sustain the contention of ■an accused that a trial court has abused its discretion in refusing to allow a plea of guilty to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty substituted therefor, it must be apparent from the record that the plea has been made unadvisedly, through ignorance, inadvertence, influence, or without deliberation, and that there is a defense that should be presented to the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.