← 277 Pa. Super. 47 - Goldberg v. Caplan

277 Pa. Super. 47 - Goldberg v. Caplan’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

cited by 19 later decisions

states following

November 1995

most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1003 (§ 4 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 401 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on 276 Pa. Super. 232 - Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Morrissey v. Curran · Wong v. Bacon · 276 Pa. Super. 220 - Shaw v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Except for actions under subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section, the district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions under this subchapter brought by the Secretary or by a participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary. State courts of competent jurisdiction and district courts of the United States shall have concurrent jurisdiction of actions under subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Zehm v. Associated Logging Contractors, Inc. · 446 Pa. Super. 359 - Bunt v. Pension Mortgage Associates, Inc.
“"to recover benefits due to him under the terms of his plan, to enforce his rights under the terms of the plan, or to clarify his rights to future benefits under the terms of the plan;"”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 13 Ohio App. 3d 275 - Spitzer v. Dytronics Co. · Morrow v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
“"(1) The term `State law' includes all laws, decisions, rules, regulations, or other State action having the effect of law, of any State. . ..”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 431 So. 2d 499 - Hoffman v. Chandler · 280 Pa. Super. 626 - Smith v. Crowder Jr. Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.