277 So. 2d 300 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably 603 So. 2d 1175 - Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases (1992), 313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State (1975)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · 229 So. 2d 239 - Baggett v. Wainwright · Simmons v. State · Kelly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We do not read Boykin [Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , [ 89 S.Ct. 1709 ] 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)] and Brady [Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 , [ 90 S.Ct. 1463 ] 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970)] as a mandate to pronounce the exact words he has the `opportunity to confront his accusers if he went to trial and that he could not be compelled to testify against himself.'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“As to the breaking and entering and petit larceny charges, it must be presumed that the perpetrator breaks and enters with a purpose and that the accomplishment of that purpose (the petit larceny) can only be classified as part of the same criminal act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.