Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

277 So. 2d 316

Steele v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1973-05-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1973

Relies on 161 So. 2d 864 - Darty v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1973-05-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant seeks review of her judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of second degree murder.

¶2The principal point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and find therein competent and sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment. Two eyewitnesses offered testimony in support of the charge made against appellant which, if believed by the jury, supported each element of the offense.1

¶3We have given consideration to appellant’s remaining point on appeal but find it to be without substantial merit. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ„ concur.

¶4. Darty v. State (Fla.App.1964) 161 So.2d 864.

/277/so2d/316 · .json · Public domain