277 So. 2d 435 - McNeely v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2007
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sirimarco v. United States · Mapp v. State · 226 So. 2d 747 - Canning v. State · Riley v. State · King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The probable cause factor must be evaluated by the officer making the arrest by the facts and circumstances existing at the time of the arrest and it may not be later strengthened by what the search revealed. ( 277 So.2d at 438 )”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State“It is fundamental that all persons are presumed to know the law....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.