State v. Haney’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably Murray v. Zuke (1969), Coonts v. Potts (2003)
4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Ivey and Estes · Murphy v. DeFrance · State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. Wright · Thompson v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. · People ex rel. Holbrook v. Petit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To constitute a ‘family’ within the meaning of the homestead laws there must be two or more persons residing together under one head or manager, with the legal or moral obligation on the part of the person who occupies the position as head of the house or family to support one or more of the other members, and there must be a state of dependency, at least partial, •on the part of the one receiving such support. * * * The family relationship must be of a permanent and domestic character, and the living together must not be merely a temporary expedient * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It is a well settled rule of law, approved by text writers and this court, that if there is any uncertainty in the judgment as to the party for or against whom it is rendered, it is proper to look to the entire record, including the pleadings and process to ascertain for or against whom the judgment is rendered.” State v. Haney (1955), — Mo. —, —, 277 S. W. 2d 632, 635 , 55 A. L. R. 2d 717, 721, 722.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To establish a homestead there must be a bona fide intention of making the premises a homestead or permanent residence of a family. That intent must be determined from a consideration of all the facts and circumstances in the case, and not merely from the declaration of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dennison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.