Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 SW3D 304 - Sackman v. State

Sackman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · Goodwin v. State · Dillard v. State · Lancaster v. Stubblefield · State Ex Rel. Haynes v. Bellamy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pursuant to Article V(3) of the IAD, if a person is not brought to trial within 180 days following a request for final disposition of untried indictments, informa-tions, or complaints as required by Article III, “the appropriate court of the jurisdiction where the indictment, information or complaint has been pending shall enter an order dismissing the same with prejudice, and any detainer based thereon shall cease to be of any force or effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.