Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 SW3D 393 - Holcomb v. Cagle

Holcomb v. Cagle’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harpeth Valley Utilities District of Davidson v. Due · Pinney v. Tarpley · Moody v. Hutchison · Wills & Wills, L.P. v. Gill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “attorneys' fees will not be recoverable in a suit between the parties to a contract to simply enforce the provisions of the contract, unless the language of the contract expressly allows for attorneys' fees to be recoverable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any cost, loss, damage or expense arising solely out of any failure of the Tenant to comply with any of the requirements or provisions of th[e] Ground Lease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.