¶1 ORDER
¶2 Defendant, Edward T. Dunn, appeals from the judgment entered after the court found him guilty of driving while intoxicated and driving while revoked. On appeal, defendant argues that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of driving while intoxicated.
¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b).