Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Va. 114 - Jackson v. Qureshi

Jackson v. Qureshi’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Noll v. Rahal · Wright v. Kaye · Perdieu v. Blackstone Family Practice Center, Inc. · Sami v. Varn · Griffett v. Ryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny health care provider who is licensed to practice in Virginia shall be presumed to know the statewide standard of care in the specialty or field of practice in which he is qualified and certified. ... A witness shall be qualified to testify as an expert on the standard of care if he demonstrates expert knowledge of the standards of the defendant’s specialty and of what conduct conforms or fails to conform to those standards and if he has had active clinical practice in either the defendant’s specialty or a related field of medicine within one year of the date of the alleged act or omission forming the basis of the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'all pediatricians who care for acutely ill children, regardless of whether they are emergency department physicians or pediatric infectious disease physicians or general pediatricians should appreciate how pertussis can present in an infant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “and this Court is not free to impose one. Jackson , 277 Va. at 125 , 671 S.E.2d at 169 . The statute states simply that the proffered expert must have an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.