Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 277 Va. 377 - Cooper v. Com.

Cooper v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

39 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stockton v. Commonwealth · Swisher v. Swisher & Craun · Bassett v. Commonwealth · Noblett v. Commonwealth · Molina v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rest[s] in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Yet, as a review of our decisions will reveal, alibi instructions have been granted in some cases and refused in others when no discernible difference is apparent. Eliminating judicial discretion will promote uniformity where uniformity is desirable, and it is desirable in this instance. Hereafter, the rule will be: grant an alibi instruction when [a scintilla of evidence ] is present, refuse when the evidence is absent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when there is `evidence that the accused was elsewhere than at the scene of the crime at the exact time or for the entire period during which it was or could have been committed'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.