¶1(concurring in result). I concur in the result and in the opinion of Justice Callahah, except that I think that there was error in instructing the jury upon the *199subject of intoxication. In view of the meager evidence that he was completely intoxicated, however, and his apparently clear recollection of numerous details concerning his movements upon this occasion, I do not think that such error is reversible.
278 A.D. 191
People v. McCormack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1951
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1951-04-24
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1951-04-24
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2014
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →