Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 Ala. 416 - Hutto v. State

Hutto v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1993 · most notably Bridges v. State (1969), Seals v. State (1968)

28 state decisions

1201965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · McNabb v. United States · Culombe v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the patrolman [who testified at trial to the defendant's oral confession] did or did not testify at the preliminary hearing or before the grand jury sheds no light on the issue of defendant's guilt or the credibility of the patrolman. * * * [T]he failure of the patrolman to testify before the grand jury or on preliminary hearing may well have been because the solicitor decided that the patrolman's testimony was unnecessary on those occasions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The McNabb rule excluding any confession obtained while defendant was illegally detained does not apply in Alabama. (Citations Omitted)” Hutto v. State, 278 Ala. 416, 422 , 178 So.2d 810, 815 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “because the evidence tends to provoke, in the jury, sympathy for the children of deceased who have lost a parent and animosity against defendant who has allegedly caused the loss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.