Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 Ark. 478 - Henry v. State

Henry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

68 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Pulley v. Harris (1984), Thomas v. State (1993)

68 state decisions

48019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chimel v. California · Rhode Island v. Innis · Mincey v. Arizona · Funchess v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Whenever two (2) or more offenses have been joined for trial solely on the ground that they are of the same or similar character and they are not part of a single scheme or plan, the defendant shall have a right to severance of the offenses. (b) The court, on application of the prosecuting attorney, or on application of the defendant other than under subsection (a), shall grant a severance of offenses: (i) if before trial, it is deemed appropriate to promote a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense; or (ii) if during trial, upon consent of the defendant, it is deemed necessary to achieve a fair determination of the defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person need not take an active part in a murder to be convicted of such if the person accompanied the person or persons who actually committed the murder and assisted in such commission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “with the premeditated and deliberated purpose of causing the death of any law enforcement officer ... when such person is acting in line of duty, he causes the death of any person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.