Hackett v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Day v. Day (1984), 76 Ark. App. 150 - Keathley v. Keathley (2001)
4 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. Russell · Shirey v. Shirey · Paulsen v. Paulsen · Riegler v. Riegler · Thomerson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n award of realty to the wife, silent as to who shall pay the mortgage, is an award subject to the mortgage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is no evidence in this case Mr. Hackett had a vested interest in the capital account with Southwestern Life Insurance Company that was fully distributive upon the date of the Hackett's divorce”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nauman v. Nauman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.