Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

278 F. 1021

Docket No. 148.

The Golden Rule

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1922.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1922-01-18

Libel by Katherine Dunnigan and others against the steam tug Golden Rule, of which the Carroll Towing Lino, Incorporated, was claimant, in which suit the Associated Operating Company was impleaded under the fifty-ninth rule. From a decree dismissing the libel and petition the libellants appeal.

2 counsel of record

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1922-01-18

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Libel by Katherine Dunnigan and others against the steam tug Golden Rule, of which the Carroll Towing Lino, Incorporated, was claimant, in which suit the Associated Operating Company was impleaded under the fifty-ninth rule. From a decree dismissing the libel and petition the libellants appeal.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3Macklin, Brown & Purdy, of New York City (Pierre M. Brown, of New York City of counsel), Cor appellants.

¶4Burlingham, Yeeder, Masten & Fearey, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Ralph W. Brown, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

¶5Before ROGERS, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Decree affirmed.

/278/f1d/1021 · .json · Public domain