In re Prescott’s Empirical Analysis
278 F. 590 · 1922
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 1951
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grinnell Washing Mach Co v. E E Johnson Co · 48 App. D.C. 258 - In re Huff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Inasmuch * * * as claim 28 completely covers applicants’ contribution to the art, there is no reason for allowing a large number of claims and thus inviting controversy and litigation.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re McConnell · In re Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.