Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.1d 949 - In re Mobile

In re Mobile’s Empirical Analysis

278 F. 949 · 1922

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1946
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1946

2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

70192219301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■ “No search warrant shall issue to search any private dwelling occupied as such unless it is being used for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, or unless it is in part used for some business purpose such as a store, shop, saloon, restaurant, hotel, or boarding house.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.