Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.2d 345 - Vroon v. Templin

Vroon v. Templin’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.2d 345 · 1960

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2012

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

50196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fallat v. Gouran · McDaniel v. North Carolina Pulp Co. · Rybolt v. Jarrett · Holt v. Middlebrook · Hodges v. Kimball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The language of the statute is plain and is to be taken as written. We do not think it permissible to construe a statute on the basis of a mere surmise as to what the Legislature intended and to assume that it was only by inadvertence that it failed to state something other than what it plainly stated. This is particularly true when there is no confusion or lack of clarity in the wording of the statute and where it could so easily have been worded to provide the meaning given by the District Court had the lawmaking body so desired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.