Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.2d 369 - Lemon v. United States

Lemon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.2d 369 · 1960

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably United States v. Halbert (1981), United States v. Bohonus (1980)

38 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

210196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on Gregory v. United States · Toliver v. United States · United States v. Sylvanus · Kreuter v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is immaterial whether only the most gullible would have been deceived”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the wire-fraud statute`protects the naive as well as the worldy-wise, and the former are more in need of protection than the latter. As a matter of fact, . . . the lack of guile on the part of those solicited may itself point with persuasion to the fraudulent character of the artifice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “protects the naive as well as the worldlywise, and the former are more in need of protection than the latter. As a matter of fact, . . . the lack of guile on the part of those solicited may itself point with persuasion to the fraudulent character of the artifice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.