Carr v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
278 F.2d 702 · 1960
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Beltran v. United States (1962), Rogers v. United States (1962)
22 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Corbin v. United States · Ginsberg v. United States · Hubsch v. United States · Johns v. United States · Wright v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`false making or materially altering, with intent to defraud, of any writing, which, if genuine, might apparently [emphasis added] be of legal efficacy, or the foundation of legal liability.' Hubsch v. United States, 256 F. 2 d 820, 823 (5 Cir. 1958); 23 Am. Jur., Forgery (1939), § 2, p. 676.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`was legally insufficient to pass title to another person or to permit [the check] to be cashed by the holder.' (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.