Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.3d 1007 - Robinson v. Solano County

Robinson v. Solano County’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.3d 1007 · 2002

Citation profile

165
cited by 165 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 165 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Maldonado v. Fontanes (2009), Moss v. U.S. Secret Service (2009)

48 federal appellate · 10 district · 3 state decisions

870200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Graham v. Connor · United States v. Mendenhall · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 165 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““requires careful attention to the facts and circumstances of each particular case” and a “careful balancing” of an individual’s liberty with the government’s interest in the application of force. Because such balancing nearly always requires a jury to sift through disputed factual contentions, and to draw inferences therefrom, we have held on many occasions that summary judgment or judgment as a matter of law in excessive force cases should be granted sparingly. This is because police misconduct cases almost always turn on a jury’s credibility determinations.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he development of the law with respect to arrests and detentions now allows us to recognize as a general principle that pointing a gun to the head of an apparently, unarmed suspect during an investigation can be a violation of the Fourth Amendment, especially where the individual poses no particular danger. [Emphasis added].” 12 . As to the validity of the”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]f the officer's mistake as to what the law requires is reasonable, ... the officer is entitled to the immunity defense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.