Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.3d 1280 - Ludlum v. Department of Justice

Ludlum v. Department of Justice’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.3d 1280 · 2002

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
November 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2022

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

130200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77K (§ 11 of the Securities Act of 1933)

Relies on Naekel v. Department of Transportation · Swingline, Inc. v. Ardco, Inc.swingline, in · Parlane Sportswear Co., Inc. v. u.s.parlane Sportswear C

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.