Turner v. Holbrook’s Empirical Analysis
278 F.3d 754 · 2002
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Negron v. United States · Tucker v. Wolter · Young v. City of Little Rock · Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing a motion to dismiss, we construe the complaint liberally, taking all factual allegations as true, and `will affirm only if it appears beyond doubt that [the plaintiff] cannot prove any set of facts in support of [the] claim which would entitle [him] to relief.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.