Robinson v. Crist’s Empirical Analysis
278 F.3d 862 · 2002
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Griffin v. California · Jeffrey Washington v. Sunny Schriver, Superintendent, Wallkill Correctional Facility · Hamilton v. Nix
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). 38 We have gone to some lengths in Part II of our opinion to describe the law applicable to Brown's claim and the facts related to it in order to explain why we reject his claim that the Missouri Supreme Court's decision was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. Little more needs to be said here. For the reasons we have already explained in some detail, we do not think Brown has shown that the Turner letter was”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lomholt v. Iowa · Jones v. Luebbers“because this claim apparently was not adjudicated by the [state] court, we likely should apply the pre-AEDPA standard of review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.