Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.3d 874 - Corjasso v. Ayers

Corjasso v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.3d 874 · 2002

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, Warden (2003), Kenneth Bernard Rouse v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina (2003)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

510200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Duncan v. Walker · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker · Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department · Holiday v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extraordinary circumstances beyond a prisoner's control make it impossible to file a petition on time.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The district court's error in failing properly and fully to inform Ford about his options with respect to the mixed petitions and in misleading him as to the legal effect of a dismissal of his petitions were `extraordinary circumstances'... that would require equitable tolling of AEDPA's statute of limitations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is appropriate only during the delay caused by the extraordinary circumstances”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.