Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 F.3d 917 - Torre v. Brickey

Torre v. Brickey’s Empirical Analysis

278 F.3d 917 · 2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Armco Steel Corp. · Max Lopez Jr v. Ga Smith Larry Loo a Acevedo Patterson 4a-2r · Margolis v. Ryan · United States v. Chavez-Vernaza · Olympic Sports Products, Inc. v. Universal Athletic Sales Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, for the purpose of determining whether an action has been commenced within the time limited, an action shall be deemed commenced as to each defendant, when the complaint is filed, and the summons served on the defendant.... (2) If the first publication of summons or other service of summons in an action occurs before the expiration of 60 days after the date on which the complaint in the action was filed, the action against each person of whom the court by such service has acquired jurisdiction shall be deemed to have been commenced upon the date on which the complaint in the action was filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.