Gaylor v. Mnuchin’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 107 · 26 U.S.C. § 119 · 26 U.S.C. § 134 · 26 U.S.C. § 1402 · 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 170 · 26 U.S.C. § 265 · 26 U.S.C. § 280A
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Lemon v. Kurtzman · Agostini v. Felton Chancellor Board of Education of the City of New York · Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York · Lynch v. Donnelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'lower the threshold for standing below the minimum requirements imposed by the Constitution,' but Congress does have the power to 'enact statutes creating legal rights, the invasion of which creates standing, even though no injury would exist without the statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gaylor v. Mnuchin“[Sections 134, 911, and 912] relate to employees whose housing is necessarily affected by their jobs. ... Some ministers may be in a similar situation ... but by no means are all ministers so restricted ... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Gaylor v. Mnuchin“concerns about entanglement [do not] justify preferential treatment for religious persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Gaylor v. Mnuchin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.