Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

278 Ga. 280

600 S.E.2d 592

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2004

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 2004-07-12

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2016

4 state decisions

Relies on Hicks v. Scott

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

FLETCHER, Chief Justice,

¶1concurring.

¶2As the majority properly notes, we are unable to address the merits of the habeas court’s order denying Harris’s habeas petition because Harris has never sought to appeal that order. However, in Hicks v. Scott,4this Court ruled that a habeas petitioner’s application for certificate of probable cause will not be dismissed as untimely if the habeas court does not explicitly inform the petitioner of the appropriate procedure to appeal that order. In this case, the habeas court indisputably failed to inform Harris of the appropriate appellate procedure. Under the rule enunciated in Hicks, therefore, Harris may still file a notice of appeal in the habeas court and an application for certificate of probable cause in this Court.

*283Decided July 12, 2004Reconsideration denied September 8, 2004.Leonard Harris, pro se.Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Thomas J. Campbell, District Attorney, for appellee.

¶3273 Ga. 358 (541 SE2d 27) (2001).

/278/ga/280 · .json · Public domain