Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 Ga. App. 663 - Windham v. State

278 Ga. App. 663 - Windham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 175 Ga. App. 179 - Syms v. State · Joachim v. State · 276 Ga. App. 353 - Giddens v. State · Garner v. State · 277 Ga. App. 673 - Linzy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction, we examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. We neither weigh the evidence nor evaluate the credibility of witnesses; we merely determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.