Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

278 Kan. 286

In re Stanford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 2004

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 2004-07-09

Decided 2004-07-09

¶1In a letter dated July 6, 2004, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent, Lee Russell Stanford, Jr., of Salina, Kansas, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the State of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 281).

¶2At the time the respondent surrendered his license a complaint had been docketed against him and was being investigated by the Disciplinary Administrator s office. The complaint contained allegations that the respondent, in his capacity as the executor of an estate, paid himself attorney fees and a partial payment of his share of the estate without an order from the court.

¶3This court, having examined the file of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent’s license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

¶4It Is Therefore Ordered that Lee Russell Stanford, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

¶5It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Lee Russell Stanford, Jr., from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

¶6It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs therein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 286).

¶7Dated this 15th day of July, 2004.

/278/kan/286 · .json · Public domain