Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 Kan. 45 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Trotter v. State (2009), Miller v. State (2014)

38 state decisions

220200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · In re L.A. · State v. Beach · Baker v. State · State v. Gadelkarim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘(1) counsel’s performance, based upon the totality of the circumstances, was deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) [defendant] was prejudiced to the extent that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s deficient performance, the appeal would have been successful.’ [Citations omitted.]” State v. Smith, 278 Kan. 45, 51-52 , 92 P.3d 1096 (2004).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.