Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 ORAPP 246 - State v. Hooper

State v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'In determining whether a defendant has absconded from supervision, appellate courts must consider whether the defendant's acts show the intent that inheres in the definition of "abscond"-not simply that the defendant failed to attend one meeting with a probation officer or could not be located for a brief period of time, but that the defendant sought to "evade the legal process of a court by hiding within or secretly leaving its jurisdiction." [ Webster's Third New Int'l Dictionary 6 (unabridged ed. 2002).] Moreover, as our prior cases reflect, the "legal process" sought to be evaded may include compliance with the terms of one's sentence, including the defendant's conduct in "mak[ing] himself available for probation." [ State v.] Smith , 312 Or. 561 , 564, 822 P.2d 1193 (1992).' "[ State v. Robbins , 345 Or. 28 , 33, 188 P.3d 262 (2008) ] (second brackets in Robbins )."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “sought to be evaded may include compliance with the terms of one's sentence, including the defendant's conduct in”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.