Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 ORAPP 260 - State v. Parnell

State v. Parnell’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Exactly what suffices to preserve a particular argument 'is not something that can be explained by a neat verbal formula.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “presume that the facts were decided in a manner consistent with the trial court's ultimate findings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “procedural fairness to the parties and to the trial court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.