State v. Akerman’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant 'cannot be required to pay restitution for [economic] damages arising out of criminal activity for which he was not convicted or which he did not admit having committed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he 'record must support a nonspeculative inference that there is a causal relationship between the defendant's criminal activities and the victim's economic damages.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any offense with respect to which the defendant is convicted or any other criminal conduct admitted by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.