State v. Lammi’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was a reasonable basis to think that [the victim's counseling] records contained exculpatory statements by the victim about the charges against [the] defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable to think that [the victim had] discussed the abuse in her counseling session, and that her statements might be contained in her counseling records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reasonable to think that her counseling records might contain evidence of similar equivocal-and thus exculpatory-statements regarding the abuse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.