Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 ORAPP 690 - State v. Lammi

State v. Lammi’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there was a reasonable basis to think that [the victim's counseling] records contained exculpatory statements by the victim about the charges against [the] defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable to think that [the victim had] discussed the abuse in her counseling session, and that her statements might be contained in her counseling records.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable to think that her counseling records might contain evidence of similar equivocal-and thus exculpatory-statements regarding the abuse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.