State v. Vage’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established that an 'error does not qualify as plain error if the record contains a competing inference that the party may have had a strategic purpose for not objecting,' and that competing inference is plausible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.