Libretti v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “I. The District Court erred in not ruling on the claimants' Motion to Dismiss/Motions for more Definite Statement. II. The District Court erred in not allowing claimants to file an Answer, conduct discovery, and file Motions for Summary Judgment. III. The District Court erred in not ruling on, and not granting, Claimants' Motions for more Definite Statement. IV. Claimants were wrongly denied a Jury trial. V. If the August 10, 2011 proceeding was only an evidentiary hearing, as Plaintiff claims, and not a trial, then the Court lacked authority to enter its judgment. VI. Claimant Frank Hohlios was unfairly denied his right to be heard at trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re US Currency Totaling $7,209.00

2. “There is another matter I believe I must relate to the Court. After the hearing was adjourned, a man in the back of the courtroom asked when he would get his chance to be heard. I asked him who he was, and he identified himself as Frank Hohlios. Mr. Hohlios then left the room before anyone could answer him. He seemed agitated. In order to avoid an ex parte communication, I am sending copies of this letter to Mr. Hohlios and Mr. Libretti. Please let me know if you have any questions about this.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re US Currency Totaling $7,209.00

3. “). D. Denial of Hohlios' Right to be Heard [¶ 29] In his final issue on appeal, Hohlios claims that he was denied the right to be heard at trial because he was present in the courtroom, but was not permitted to participate in the proceeding. Because this issue is also one that was not raised below, we use a plain error analysis in reviewing the claimed error. [¶ 30] The failure in Hohlios' claim under the plain error analysis is his inability to establish,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In Re US Currency Totaling $7,209.00