State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2009
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Geders v. United States · Kilcullen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was in a sense then a ward of the Court. He was not entitled to be cured or assisted or helped approaching his cross examination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. Leeke · Perry v. Leeke“We attach significance to the words 'normally confer.' Normally, counsel is not permitted to confer with his defendant client between direct examination and cross examination. Should counsel for a defendant, after direct examination, request the judge to declare a recess so that he might talk with his client before cross examination begins, the judge would and should unhesitatingly deny the request.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. Leeke“Whoever shall unlawfully seize, confine, inveigle, decoy, kidnap, abduct or carry away any other person by any means whatsoever without authority of law, except when a minor is seized or taken by a parent thereof, shall be guilty of a felony and, wpon conviction, shall suffer the punishment of life imprisonment unless sentenced for murder as provided in § 16-3-20.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Owens v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.