Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 So. 2d 451 - Cochran v. State

278 So. 2d 451 - Cochran v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2002 · most notably Johnson v. State (1985), 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State (1989)

32 state decisions

1701973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bond v. State · Evans v. State · 279 So. 2d 156 - Stringer v. State · McLendon v. State · Ivey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule in regard to a peremptory instruction is the same in criminal and civil cases, the rule being that when all the evidence on behalf of the state is taken as true, together with all sound or reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom if there is enough to support a verdict of conviction, the peremptory instruction must be denied.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a criminal prosecution, the jury may accept testimony of some witnesses and reject that of others, it may accept in part and reject in part the testimony of any witness, or it may believe part of the evidence on behalf of the State and part of that for the accused. In other words, the credibility of witnesses is not for the reviewing court. Bond v. State, 249 Miss. 352 , 162 So.2d 510 (1964). It was the function of the jury to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve the issues. Since there was ample evidence, which if believed by the jury, justified the verdict, the verdict will not be disturbed on appeal. Murphree v. State, 228 So.2d 599 (Miss. 1969). ( 264 So.2d at 830 ). [Other citations omitted]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.