Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 SW2D 874 - Tudor v. Henry

Tudor v. Henry’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Fisher · Osborne v. Moore · Broaddus v. Grout · Tidwell v. Cheshier · Jones v. Carver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the contract is insufficient it not only precludes recovery for specific performance but also for damages for the breach thereof. This is true because an ‘action for damages for the breach of a contract is, in effect, an action for its enforcement, and the statute, in denying an action for its enforcement, likewise denies an action for damages for its breach.’ Alworth v. Ellison, Tex.Civ.App., 27 S.W.2d 639, 640, writ refused.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.