Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo))
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Gideon v. Wainwright · McMann v. Richardson · 166 Tex. Crim. 37 - Cawley v. State · Kerns v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“how [it is] right for a man and woman to have a relationship” because the complainant had revealed to appellant that she believes herself to be gay. These details of the encounters were relayed by the complainant in her testimony as well. 5 . The record reveals no rational basis on which the jury could have doubted or disregarded the significant amount of corroborating evidence, as would be relevant to appellate review of the record for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brooks v. State“will generally turn on whether there was a substantial amount of non-accomplice evidence and whether the record reveals any rational basis on which the jury could have doubted or disregarded that evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re FLR“The prejudice prong of Strickland requires showing 'a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Diruzzo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.