Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 SW3D 367 - Baldwin v. State

Baldwin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Chimel v. California · Alabama v. White · Minnesota v. Dickerson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Deputy Smith believed that appellant's answer to a question regarding the location of his identification constituted permission to retrieve that identification. We find this belief to be objectively unreasonable. Appellant's response was simply an answer to the officer's question (after being handcuffed) and not a consent for the officer to search his person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'Probable cause' is a greater level of suspicion than 'reasonable suspicion' and requires information that is more substantial in quality or content and a greater reliability with respect to the source of information.... Probable cause is a relatively high level of suspicion, though it falls far short of a preponderance of the evidence standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “). 84 . Black’s Law Dictionary 276 (5th ed.1979). 85 . See Kaupp v. Texas, 538 U.S. 626, 631 , 123 S.Ct. 1843 , 155 L.Ed.2d 814 (2003) (mere submission to a claim of lawful authority is not consent); Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 , 358 & n. 22, 88 S.Ct. 507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (stating that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.