Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 SW3D 615 - Depp v. Commonwealth

Depp v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Patterson v. Illinois · Iowa v. Tovar · United States v. McDowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Faretta did not require any specific form or magic words for there to be a knowing and voluntary choice to proceed pro se.”). 3 . See, e.g., Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77, 88 , 124 S.Ct. 1379 , 158 L.Ed.2d 209 (2004) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that [the right to self-representation is] accompanied by the right to be informed by the trial court of the dangers inherent in doing so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.