Millman v. Millman’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 72 Wis. 2d 631 - Anderson v. Anderson · Hull v. Hull · Smith v. Smith · 238 Mo. App. 560 - Fear v. Ebony Paint Mfg. Co. · Hicks v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reason for the rule is that a party cannot proceed to enforce and have the benefit of such portions of a judgment as are in his favor and appeal from those against it-in other words, the right to proceed on a judgment and enjoy its fruits and the right to appeal therefrom are totally inconsistent positions, and the election to pursue one course must be deemed an abandonment of the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Unlike Hull , where the parties proceeded to trial, [hjusband and [w]ife were found by the trial court to have reached a settlement. The parties placed the material terms of the settlement on the record. In this case, [hjusband paid to [w]ife what was owed by him at the times specified by the terms of the parties’ settlement, as memorialized in the [ajmended [jjudgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the amount received was a small portion of the total judgment; (2) the amount accepted has effectively been conceded to be due by a [spouse] who did not appeal; (3) the acceptance of benefits was due to financial distress; (4) the absence of prejudice to the judgment debtor [spouse]; and (5) where the only issue on appeal is whether an award will be increased.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.