Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 SW3D 836 - Gant v. State

Gant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 294th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Johnson v. State · Clayton v. State · Watson v. State · United States v. Romm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conscious objective or desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.” Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 6.03 (a) (West 2003). A person acts knowingly when he is aware (a) of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.