Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 278 U.S. 200 - West v. Standard Oil Co.

West v. Standard Oil Co.’s Empirical Analysis

278 U.S. 200 · 1929

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 15 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1996 · most notably Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board (1943), Wilbur v. United States ex rel. Kadrie (1930)

59 federal appellate · 15 district · 17 state decisions

23019291930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWork v. Standard Oil Co. (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Noble v. Union River Logging Railroad · St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp. · Knight v. United Land Ass'n · Johnson v. Towsley · Cameron v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The broad power of control and supervision conferred upon the Secretary `does not clothe him with any discretion to enlarge or curtail the rights of the grantee, nor to substitute his judgment for the will of Congress as manifested in the granting act.' Payne v. Central Pacific Railway Co., 255 U.S. 228 , 236, 41 S.Ct. 314, 65 L. Ed. 598.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.