¶1Mr. A. W. Patterson for petitioner.
¶2Mr. Leon M. Bazile, with whom Mr. E. Warre7i Wall was on the brief, for respondents.
¶4Reversed on the authority of Brooke v. City of Norfolk, 277 U. S. 27.
278 U.S. 562
Docket No. 38.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1928-10-22
2 counsel of record
Relies on Brooke v. City of Norfolk
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-10-22
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1951
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. A. W. Patterson for petitioner.
¶2Mr. Leon M. Bazile, with whom Mr. E. Warre7i Wall was on the brief, for respondents.
¶4Reversed on the authority of Brooke v. City of Norfolk, 277 U. S. 27.